UNMARRIED DAUGHTER CAN CLAIM MAINTENANCE FROM FATHER: MADRAS HIGH COURT

The Trial Court, in this case rejected the girl’s application on the ground that is a major and that in terms of Section 125 (1) (b) and (c) of CrPC, and that she is not entitled for any maintenance and that she does not suffer from any physical or mental disablement. Contending that, combined readingRead more about UNMARRIED DAUGHTER CAN CLAIM MAINTENANCE FROM FATHER: MADRAS HIGH COURT[…]

DELHI COURT ORDERS MAN TO SERVE AT OLD-AGE HOME FOR DRUNKEN DRIVING OFFENCE

Additional Sessions Judge, District Courts, Dwarka, New Delhi, ordered the convict, who was found under influence of liquor and quantity of liquor consumed was found to be 550mg /100 ml which is much higher than permissible limit i.e. 30 mg/ 100 ml and held guilty u/s. 138 (3)/177 and section 185 of M.V Act., toRead more about DELHI COURT ORDERS MAN TO SERVE AT OLD-AGE HOME FOR DRUNKEN DRIVING OFFENCE[…]

MOTHER CANNOT GIVE UP MAINTENANCE RIGHTS OF CHILD DURING MUTUAL CONSENT DIVORCE – SUPREME COURT

The Supreme Court, while considering an appeal, noticed one of the terms agreed between the couple taking Divorce with Mutual Consent. The term read – The applicant Wife has released the right of monthly maintenance to the daughter with the non-applicant (Husband). The bench comprising Justice Uday Umesh Lalit and Justice Indu Malhotra has observedRead more about MOTHER CANNOT GIVE UP MAINTENANCE RIGHTS OF CHILD DURING MUTUAL CONSENT DIVORCE – SUPREME COURT[…]

SIX MONTHS WAITING PERIOD IN DIVORCE BY MUTUAL CONSENT OF HINDU MARRIAGE ACT NOT MANDATORY – SUPREME COURT

The Supreme Court had waived the waiting period under Article 142. The two Judge Bench of Supreme Court held that that the period mentioned in Section 13 B(2) was not mandatory but directory,  and that it will be open to the Court to exercise its discretion in the facts and circumstances of each case whereRead more about SIX MONTHS WAITING PERIOD IN DIVORCE BY MUTUAL CONSENT OF HINDU MARRIAGE ACT NOT MANDATORY – SUPREME COURT[…]

PROCEDURE TO CHANGE THE LAWYER DURING PENDENCY OF A CASE

In any litigation or court case, Civil or Criminal, the lawyer-client relationship is intricate. It is part exercise in teamwork and part close relationship requiring the revealing and maintaining of sensitive and confidential personal information. In all aspects, this relationship between the lawyer and the client is based on mutual trust and privacy. Once theRead more about PROCEDURE TO CHANGE THE LAWYER DURING PENDENCY OF A CASE[…]

SPECIAL POCSO COURT IN RAJASTHAN COMPLETES RAPE TRIAL IN 5 DAYS

In an Exemplary move, Sh. Anil Kaushik, District & Sessions Judge, (POCSO Court), Sikar, Rajasthan completed a court trial of rape of a four year old girl in five working days. The incident occurred on 30th January and the proactive approach of Sikar police led to filing of the charge-sheet on 4th February, after whichRead more about SPECIAL POCSO COURT IN RAJASTHAN COMPLETES RAPE TRIAL IN 5 DAYS[…]

EVEN AFTER DISCLOSURE MADE BY CANDIDATE OF PENDING CRIMINAL CASES, EMPLOYER CAN CONSIDER ANTECEDENTS AND SUITABILITY BEFORE OFFERING JOB: SUPREME COURT

The Supreme Court has observed that even after disclosure is made by a candidate about criminal cases pending against him, the employer would be well within his rights to consider the antecedents and the suitability of the candidate. While considering so, employer can certainly take into account the job profile for which the selection isRead more about EVEN AFTER DISCLOSURE MADE BY CANDIDATE OF PENDING CRIMINAL CASES, EMPLOYER CAN CONSIDER ANTECEDENTS AND SUITABILITY BEFORE OFFERING JOB: SUPREME COURT[…]